Religious leaders hold profound
influence, shaping moral and health-related decisions. In this instance, their
role as stewards of discernment may have faltered, as they relied on incomplete
or misleading information. Questions arising across congregations now are: Were
they too quick to endorse the novel injections without rigorous scrutiny? Did
they overlook dissenting expert voices or alternative approaches to health?
For some religious communities,
concerns over the ethical implications of COVID vaccine development were
particularly profound. Biotechnologies like COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ rely on cell
lines derived from aborted fetal tissue during development or testing. While
these cell lines date back decades, their use raises significant ethical and
theological concerns for many believers, including:
1. Sanctity of Life: Religious
teachings often uphold the sanctity of life from conception. For many
Christians, the association of vaccine production with abortion—even
indirectly—creates a moral dilemma, as they oppose benefiting from actions they
consider intrinsically wrong.
2. Halal Considerations: In
Islam, the use of materials derived from prohibited (haram) sources, such as
aborted fetal cells, is deeply troubling. This concern is tied to the faith’s
emphasis on consuming and using permissible (halal) products. While many
scholars ruled vaccines as permissible under the principle of necessity,
lingering ethical concerns remained.
3. Moral
Complicity: The principle of moral complicity weighs heavily in religious
ethics. Even if the abortion occurred decades ago, using its outcomes in
scientific research could be seen as an endorsement of that act, creating a
spiritual conflict for those opposed to abortion.
4. Informed
Consent: Many faith leaders did not adequately explain the origin of these cell
lines to their congregations. This lack of transparency has compounded
mistrust, leaving many feeling that they were coerced into decisions that
violated their conscience.
5. Use
of religious teaching to persuade congregations to get vaccinated
Across faiths, efforts to reduce
‘vaccine hesitancy’ were made in collaboration with health authorities, often
with premises of worship doubling as vaccination centres.
To persuade their congregations,
Islamic scholars and faith leaders were encouraged to cite verses from the
Quran that emphasise the sanctity of life and the importance of protecting
oneself and others. For instance, the verse: "And whoever saves one life,
it is as if they have saved all of mankind" (Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:32). This
verse could be used to frame vaccination as not only permissible but as a
religious duty to preserve life and prevent harm, resonating deeply with
Islamic teachings about communal responsibility.
Similarly, to encourage the
Jewish community to get vaccinated, influential Jewish leaders like Chief Rabbi
Ephraim Mirvis emphasised that getting vaccinated is a "religious
imperative” .
Christian leaders also leveraged
religious teachings to promote the experimental COVID-19 vaccinations. For
example, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, aligned his pro-vaccine
message with Jesus’ teaching to “love your neighbour.” He publicly urged people
to “get vaccinated, get boosted,” presenting it as an act of love and
responsibility towards others. This approach, appealing to the Christian
principle of selflessness and care for the wider community, using peoples’
faith to encourage adherence to public health measures while framing them as
moral imperatives in line with scripture, is deeply regrettable.
A call for faith leaders to
rectify their mistakes
Personally, it really upsets me
how peoples’ faith has been exploited for political and other motives. I have
previous shared my disappointment with leaders of the Christian Church. But all
faith communities, not only Christian ones, are now facing the very real
implications of their leaders endorsements, with many members ill or bereaved.
Faith leaders must now prioritise transparent dialogue, apologise where
necessary, and promise they will never endorse government policy or any drugs
again.
This reflection isn't about blame
but about ensuring future crises, which we know are coming, are met with wisdom
and courage. I hope, through the COVID experience, that faith communities will
emerge committed to the truth so that together we can co-create a better world
for all people.
Dr Tess Lawrie